More than 500 people have signed an online petition ask­ing Caltrans to reschedule a meeting on proposed U.S. Highway 101 safety corridor improvements so that the hearing can be held in Eureka.

The $23 million improve­ment project, which includes adding signals and an inter­change on the stretch of U.S. Highway 101 between Eureka and Arcata, is slated to go before the California Coastal Commission at its May meet­ing in San Rafael.

“Our immediate concern is that the meeting is going to be held 250 miles away,” Humboldt Baykeeper said.


Baykeeper started the online petition to hold the item until September when the coastal commission is scheduled to meet in Eureka.


Under the plan, Caltrans will construct a compact diamond interchange at Indianola Cutoff, put a “half signal” at airport road and close the remaining median openings in the corridor, including open­ings at Mid-City Motor World, Bayside Cutoff and Bracut Industrial Park. The “half sig­nal” would allow traffic to come onto the highway head­ing north and south and allow southbound traffic to make the left turn onto Airport Road but would not stop southbound traffic on the highway.


Caltrans spokesman Scott Burger said speed limits are determined independently from construction mandated by the California vehicle code.


He said the safety corridor speed limit between the Eureka Slough bridges and the Gannon Slough bridges would remain at 50 miles per hour until an engineering and traffic survey was conducted follow­ing the construction.


If 85 percent of traffic is found to travel above 50 mile per hour following the im­provements, Burger said, the speed limit could rise.


The freeway north of the Gannon Slough will remain unchanged, Burger said.


Coastal Commission Federal Consistency Manager Mark Delaplaine said the scheduled review is a “phased review”— the Federal Highway Adminis­tration wants to know that the project is consistent with feder­al laws before they commit funding to the project.


“Federal consistency certifi­cation is required whenever a federal agency permits a proj­ect or approves it in some way,” Delaplaine said.


While the project will need to come back to the commis­sion for permits and final approval, this phase of approval can impact the final decision. “If you have strong feelings about what ought to happen, now is the time to get it in,” Delaplaine said. “(The review is) fairly complete and sometimes it ends up being most of the analysis we borrow when we go through the per­mitting process. It saves us work later if we get this kind of analysis done now.”


Hum­boldt Baykeeper said public comment is needed to address issues with the plan, including how potentially increased speeds will affect bicyclist safety on the safety corridor and Old Arcata Road, which will see increased traffic due to the median closures. 


Nor does the plan address predicted sea level rise. Delaplaine said the Coastal Commission is required to hold the phased review by May because of a six-month review deadline. Caltrans would have to agree to extend the time for the project review. It’s unclear if Caltrans is considering the request. “I’ve encouraged Cal­trans to listen to it,” Delaplaine said. “We always try to have major projects in the area, if we can do it.”


Read Original Article